In a sport where every second counts and the balance between effort and recovery defines success, British research could redefine how runners prepare for the demands of the season.

A study published this week in The Journal of Physiology, one of the leading publications on exercise physiology, reveals that passive immersion in hot water, a simple and accessible procedure, leads to significant improvements in aerobic capacity and cardiovascular efficiency.

For cross-country runners, from amateurs aspiring to their first sub-4 hours to competitive athletes, this technique represents not only a recovery tool, but a catalyst for sustained performance without the need to increase the volume of training.

The report, led by physiologist Elliott Jenkins of the Metropolitan University of Cardiff (Wales), comes in a context where over-training injuries affect 70% of middle and long distance running practitioners, according to data from the International Association of Athletics Federations (World Athletics).

Study Design: Rigour in the Service of the Practical Corridor

The study, which covered two years of research under controlled but realistic conditions, involved ten consistently trained runners: with at least three years of competitive experience and an average baseline maximum VO2 of 60 milliliters per kilogram per minute (the typical threshold for an athlete capable of completing a marathon in less than three hours).

These participants, recruited to reflect the diversity of the runner community (from popular runners to semi-professionals), maintained their usual routine of 60-80 kilometers per week, including interval sessions, background shoots and threshold work.

The protocol adopted a design based on each volunteer completing two intervention blocks of five weeks each, separated by a period of «quitting» of at least four weeks to eliminate residual effects.

The basis of the test was based on the so-called "passive heat immersion (HWI)", in which runners were immersed immediately after their sessions in a tank of water maintained at 40 °C (104 °F) for 45 minutes, five days per week.

This temperature, tolerable and not extreme, raised the core body temperature by 1 to 2°C, simulating the thermal stress of a competition in warm conditions without the mechanical impact of additional exercise.

While the control group (CON) followed the same training schedule, but with post-session passive standard rest (without immersing in the heat bath).

Pre- and post-intervention evaluations were exhaustive: treadmill ergospirometry tests to measure the maximum VO2 and the maximum velocity at VO2 (vVO2 max), total hemoglobin analysis by carbon monoxide reinhalation, echocardiograms to monitor cardiac function and 5 km time trial simulations. All measurements were made in a standardized environment (20-22°C ambient temperature and 50% relative humidity), with seasonal variations incorporated to emulate the realities of outdoor training.

«We opted for an approach that prioritised actual applicability», says Jenkins in the study paper. «We were not looking for lab supermen, but runners like those who compete in local events or aspire to qualify for Boston». Professor Mike Stembridge, supervisor of the project, adds: «By crossing seasons, we capture the impact of winter weather, which often erodes athletes' aerobic capacity».

Quantifiable Results: Improvements that Translate into Minutes and Seconds

The findings, backed by statistical analysis, demonstrate concrete physiological adaptations that any runner can see in their training watch.

Thus, after five weeks of HWI:

• The maximum VO2 increased by an average of 4% (from 60 to 62.4 ml/kg/min). In practical terms, this translates into a cut of approximately 40 seconds in a 5-kilometer race or 2 to 3 minutes in a marathon, keeping the running economy constant.
• Total hemoglobin mass increased by 33 grams (from a baseline of about 850 g to 883 g), enhancing oxygen transport without the risks associated with altitude-induced hypoxia such as polycythemia. In parallel, the plasma volume expanded between 5% and 7%, optimizing tissue perfusion during prolonged exertion.
• In the cardiovascular field, the systolic volume -the amount of blood ejected by heartbeat- increased to 8%, while the maximum cardiac output was raised by 6%. The vVO2 max improved by 0.8 km/h (from 17.5 to 18.3 km/h), allowing to sustain more intense rhythms with less fatigue. In addition, resting heart rate dropped 4 beats per minute, a key indicator of superior recovery.
• In the 5K time trials, participants reported a 3.2% improvement in speed, with a noticeable reduction in lactate build-up at anaerobic thresholds.
• Whereas, on the other hand, no significant variations in muscle mass or peripheral thermoregulation (such as sweating rate) were observed which suggests that benefits are concentrated in the «central nucleus» of the aerobic system: heart, lungs and circulation.

On the other hand, the control group showed minimal fluctuations ( 1%), thus isolating the effect of heat as a determining factor.

So, a priori, these advances compete directly with traditional interventions such as training at altitude, which offer similar gains (3-5% in VO2 max) but require complex logistics and downtime. «It is an acclimatization accessible to the modern runner», summarizes Jenkins, «with results that rival elite methods but at zero cost».

Underlying Mechanisms: How Passive Heat Transforms the Runner’s Body

At the molecular level, passive heat acts as a controlled stress simulator: thermal lift activates thermal shock proteins (HSPs), which protect and optimize muscle mitochondria, improving energy efficiency. This, combined with increased vasodilation, promotes blood perfusion and reduces post-exercise inflammation, a critical factor in injury prevention.

The study discusses how this technique reduces the risk of overtraining by 70%, according to previous epidemiological models, by replicating thermal stress without additional joint wear from running.

Its implications are vast: for marathon preparations in temperate climates it offers a natural preacclimatization; for ultras or trail running, it accelerates the recovery on high volume blocks.

However, the report is cautious with its limitations: the duration of five weeks prevents long-term extrapolations, and the focus on already adapted athletes excludes beginners.

Testimonies and Applicability: The Voice of the Runner Community

The dissemination of the study has generated an immediate echo in the runner sphere. In Spain, there are already professional runners who perform this type of recovery pointing out some of them that after 3 weeks of treatment notice a freshness in the workouts they had not felt before. "It is as if the body will reset itself without effort», point out some of them.

The recommended protocol is straightforward and adaptable:

• 30 to 45 minutes of immersion at 40 °C, three to five days a week, immediately after intensive sessions.
• Alternatives such as saunas or gym jacuzzis are feasible if there is no bathtub available.
• Setting blocks of four to six weeks with a break of another four weeks
• The first signs, such as higher lactic thresholds, appear early.

Ultimately, this scientific revolution underlines an eternal principle of running: excellence lies in subtlety.

We will see if more evidence of this scientific discovery that can revolutionize recovery and post-training sessions for both professionals and amateurs is published in the coming months.

Official link:

To access the full study:

Long-term passive heat acclimation enhances maximal oxygen consumption via haematological and cardiac adaptation in endurance runners

#RunningNews #CalorPasivo #Entrenamiento2026 #RunnersEspaña #VO2MaxHack

Y recuerda….. YOU`LL NEVER RUN ALONE!!